Period of Revelation
It could not be known from any authentic tradition
but a study of its subject matter shows that this Sura also was sent down in the same
period in which the Suras AlMumin
AsSajdahand AshShura
were sent down. It appears that the revelation of this series of the Suras began when
the disbelievers of Makkah were planning to put an end to the Holy Prophet's life. Day
and night they were holding consultations in their assemblies as how to eliminate him
and even an attack on his life also had been made as has been clearly referred to in vv.
79-80.
Theme and Topics
In this Sura a forceful and severe criticism has been made of the Quraishand the
common Arabs creeds and superstitions of ignorance in which they persisted
and their stubbornness has been exposed in a firm and effective way
so that every member of the society
who was reasonable in some degree
should be made to consider the evils in which the community was involved and its
tyrannical treatment of the person who was trying to redeem it. The discourse starts in a
way as if to say: "You
by means of your mischiefs
want that the revelation of this Book should be stopped
but Allah has never withheld the appointment of His Prophets and the revelation of His
Books because of the mischief of the people
but has destroyed the wicked people
who obstructed the way of His guidance. The same He will do again. A little further in
vv. 41-43 and 79-80 the same thing has been reiterated. Though the people who were
plotting against his life are meant
the Holy Prophet has been addressed to the effect: "whether you remain alive or not
We will certainly punish the wicked
and the people themselves have been plainly warned to the effect:
If you have decided to take an action against Our Prophet
We too will take a decisive action." Then
it has been told what is the reality of the religion that the people are following so
devotedly and what are the arguments on whose strength they are resisting
Muhammad (upon whom be Allah's peace and Blessings). They themselves admit that
thc Creator of the earth and heavens and of themselves and their deities is only Allah.
They also know and admit that the blessings they are benefiting from
have been bestowed by Allah; yet they insist on making others associates of Allah in
His Godhead. They regard the servants as the children of Allah
and that too daughters
whom they regard as disgraceful for themselves. They believe that the angels are
goddesses; they have carved their images as females; they adorn them with female
dresses and ornaments
and call them daughters of Allah: they worship them and invoke them for the fulfilment
of their needs. How did they know that the angels were female? When they are rebuked
for these superstitions
they present the pretence of destiny and say :"Had Allah disapproved of these our
practices
we could not have worshipped these images
whereas the means of finding out whether Allah had approved of something or not
are His Books and not those things which are happening in the world according to His
Will. For under His Will not only idol worship but crimes like theft and adultery
robbery. murder
etc. also are being committed. Can this argument be used to justify as right and proper
this commission of every crime and evil is the world? When it is asked:Have you any
other authority
apart from this wrong argument
for the polytheism of yours?They reply
The same has been the practice since the time of our forefathers.
In other words
this in their opinion is a strong enough argument for a creed's being right and true
whereas the Prophet Ibraham
descent from whom is the only basis of their pride and distinction
had rejected the religion of his elders and left his home
and he had discarded every such blind imitation of his forefathers
which did not have the support of any rational argument. Then
if these people had to follow their elders only
for this also they selected their most ignorant elders and abandoned their most
illustrious elders like the Prophets Abraham and Ishmael (on whom be peace). When
they are asked: "Has ever a Prophet or a Book sent down by God also given this
teaching that others beside Allah too are worthy of worship? they present this practice
of the Christians as an argument that they took Jesus son of Mary as son of God and
worshipped him; whereas the question was not this whether the community of a
Prophet had committed shirkor not
but this whether a Prophet had himself taught shirk. Jesus son of Mary had never said
that he was son of G
